Home/Superior Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Thorpe

Commonwealth v. Thorpe

492 A.2d 1138, 342 Pa. Super. 316, 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7779
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 10, 1985
DocketAppeal No. 1427
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 492 A.2d 1138 (Commonwealth v. Thorpe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Thorpe, 492 A.2d 1138, 342 Pa. Super. 316, 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7779 (Pa. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Today we decided that double jeopardy principles do not bar reprosecution of appellant’s co-defendant on charges arising from the killing of Zollie Perry. Appellant raises the identical issue decided in that case, and we therefore affirm on the basis of Commonwealth v. Simons, 342 Pa.Super. 281, 492 A.2d 1119 (1985).

Order affirmed.

WIEAND, J., files a concurring opinion. BROSKY, J., joins, and files a concurring statement. DEL SOLE, J., files a dissenting statement in which POPOVICH, J., joins. SPAETH, President Judge, files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hall
538 A.2d 43 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
492 A.2d 1138, 342 Pa. Super. 316, 1985 Pa. Super. LEXIS 7779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-thorpe-pasuperct-1985.