Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neale & Co.
107 A. 814, 264 Pa. 408, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 663
Opinion
Nothing can be profitably added to the opinion of the Superior Court affirming the judgment of the court below, and, on that opinion, this appeal is dismissed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neale & Co., 107 A. 814, 264 Pa. 408, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 663 (Pa. 1919).
107 A. 814 (Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neale & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Slade v. Cheung & Risser Enterprises, Inc.
10 Pa. D. & C.3d 627 (Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas, 1979)
Williams & Co. v. Pittsburgh School District
244 A.2d 37 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Tax Review Board v. Slater System, Inc.
398 Pa. 477 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1960)
Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v. Pittsburgh
100 A.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1953)
Commonwealth v. McKinley-Gregg Automobile Co.
28 A.2d 919 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Beaver County Cooperative Association's Appeal
180 A. 98 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Commonwealth v. Gulick
22 Pa. D. & C. 433 (Bucks County Court of Common Pleas, 1935)
Grant, Hutcheson Co. v. Pennsylvania Securities Commission
15 Pa. D. & C. 431 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)