Commonwealth v. Thompson

245 A.2d 268, 431 Pa. 161, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 604
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 22, 1968·No. No. 475·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted. The order of the Superior Court is vacated, and the record is remanded to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Philadelphia County for appointment of counsel on appeal to the Superior Court in accordance with the dissenting opinion of Judge Spaulding in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 212 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 240 A. 2d 384 (1968) (Hoffman, J. and Hannum, J., joined in this opinion). See also Commonwealth v. Walters, 431 Pa. 74, 79, n.4, 244 A. 2d 757, 761, n.4 (1968); Pa. R. Crim. P. 1503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Thompson, 245 A.2d 268, 431 Pa. 161, 1968 Pa. LEXIS 604 (Pa. 1968).

245 A.2d 268 (Commonwealth v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Foster
560 A.2d 800 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Maple
559 A.2d 953 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)
Commonwealth v. Harris
553 A.2d 428 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1989)