Commonwealth v. Tejeda

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Tejeda

932 A.2d 877, 593 Pa. 522, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1914

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedSeptember 13, 2007

DocketAppeal 373 MAL 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 932 A.2d 877 (Commonwealth v. Tejeda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Tejeda, 932 A.2d 877, 593 Pa. 522, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1914 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of September 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the PCRA court to consider whether petitioner is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a requested timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 573 Pa. 375, 825 A.2d 630 (2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of September 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the PCRA court to consider whether petitioner is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a requested timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 573 Pa. 375, 825 A.2d 630 (2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 A.2d 877, 593 Pa. 522, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-tejeda-pa-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack