Commonwealth v. Tejeda
932 A.2d 877, 593 Pa. 522, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1914
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 13th day of September 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The order of the Superior Court is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED to the PCRA court to consider whether petitioner is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a requested timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 573 Pa. 375, 825 A.2d 630 (2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Tejeda, 932 A.2d 877, 593 Pa. 522, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 1914 (Pa. 2007).
932 A.2d 877 (Commonwealth v. Tejeda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Liebel
825 A.2d 630 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)