Commonwealth v. Taylor
This text of 281 A.2d 845 (Commonwealth v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
Wayman Taylor appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed by the court following his conviction by a jury in Dauphin County of murder in the second degree. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict is not questioned; however, we have read the record and are completely satisfied that the trial evidence supports the conviction.
Although no request for further instructions, or exceptions of any nature were entered to the charge of the court to the jury at trial, the appellant now maintains that in two instances it was erroneous and a new trial is required. We have studied the charge in its entirety and conclude that nothing therein warrants a reversal of the judgment. The issues for decision were correctly and clearly defined and submitted in a fair manner.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.2d 845, 444 Pa. 617, 1971 Pa. LEXIS 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-taylor-pa-1971.