Commonwealth v. Taylor

113 Mass. 1
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

1. As the offence charged was within the jurisdiction "of the District Court, the want of an allegation of the defendant’s residence was immaterial. Gen. Sts. c. 172, § 19.

2. The statute establishing the District Court makes no provision for a trial by jury in that court, except in civil actions. In all criminal cases brought before it, the proceedings are like those in police courts, and a trial by jury can only be had in the Superior Court on appeal. St. 1872, c. 201, §§ 1, 6.

3. The remaining ground of the motion to dismiss was removed by the amendment of the original record of the District Court, and the corresponding amendment of the copy thereof. Such amendments, supplying merely clerical omissions in the record, may lawfully be made, even in criminal cases. State v. Maher, 35 Maine, 225. State v. Craton, 6 Ired. 164. Welch v. Damon, 11 Gray, 383. Commonwealth v. Phillips, 11 Pick. 28.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Taylor, 113 Mass. 1 (Mass. 1873).

113 Mass. 1 (Commonwealth v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Yasin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2019
Commonwealth v. Vincent
42 N.E. 332 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Olson v. Muskegon Circuit Judge
13 N.W. 369 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1882)
Cook v. Perry
5 N.W. 1054 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)