Commonwealth v. Szymczyk

613 A.2d 535, 531 Pa. 359, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 410
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 17, 1992·No. Appeal No. 127 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in Commonwealth v. Corporan, — Pa. ——, 613 A.2d 530 (1992), we affirm.

NIX, C.J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter. ZAPPALA, J., concurs in the result. CAPPY, J., notes his dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Szymczyk, 613 A.2d 535, 531 Pa. 359, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 410 (Pa. 1992).

613 A.2d 535 (Commonwealth v. Szymczyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Corporan
613 A.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)