Commonwealth v. Sulzner

48 A. 476, 198 Pa. 502, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 828
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 11, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 166·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied that the court below committed no error in entering the judgment appealed from, and that the office of treasurer of a school board is an appointed office within the meaning of the constitution.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Sulzner, 48 A. 476, 198 Pa. 502, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 828 (Pa. 1901).

48 A. 476 (Commonwealth v. Sulzner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Knox v. Board of School Directors of Susquenita School District
888 A.2d 640 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Bowers v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
167 A.2d 480 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)
Buell v. Union Township School District
150 A.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Anderson v. Board of Public Education of Pittsburgh School District
33 A.2d 68 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Com. Ex Rel. Eagen v. Petrusefski
12 A.2d 3 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Teachers' Tenure Act Cases
197 A. 344 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Swaney v. Sch. Dist. of Georges Twp.
96 Pa. Super. 395 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Glessner's Case
137 A. 166 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)
Muir v. Madden
133 A. 226 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Commonwealth ex rel. Thomas v. Kelley
2 Pa. D. & C. 797 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Arthur v. Philadelphia
117 A. 269 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Smith v. Granger
13 Tiess. 213 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1916)
Ulrich v. Coaldale Borough
53 Pa. Super. 246 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1913)