Commonwealth v. Suggs

343 A.2d 669, 463 Pa. 89, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 924
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 7, 1975
DocketAppeal Nos. 622
StatusPublished

This text of 343 A.2d 669 (Commonwealth v. Suggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Suggs, 343 A.2d 669, 463 Pa. 89, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 924 (Pa. 1975).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The Court being equally divided, the judgments of sentence are affirmed.

[90]*90EAGEN, O’BRIEN, POMEROY, JJ., would affirm. ROBERTS, NIX, MANDERINO, JJ., would reverse the judgments of sentence and remand for a new trial. JONES, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
343 A.2d 669, 463 Pa. 89, 1975 Pa. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-suggs-pa-1975.