Commonwealth v. Strunk, M.
This text of Commonwealth v. Strunk, M. (Commonwealth v. Strunk, M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 54 MAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : MICHAEL L. STRUNK, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of October, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming [Petitioner’s] conviction for unlawful contact with a minor where the complainant testified that the sole verbal contact was in the first incident after any criminal offense was completed, and the Superior Court held that a step necessary for a greater sex offense constituted “contact,” for purposes of the statute.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Strunk, M., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-strunk-m-pa-2023.