Commonwealth v. Stroup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Stroup

334 A.2d 292, 234 Pa. Super. 70, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1503

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 31, 1975·No. Appeal, No. 1176·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court com[71] mitted until he has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Jacobs, Hoffman and Spaeth, JJ., concur in the result for the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Bowes, 233 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, 335 A.2d 718 (1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court com[71] mitted until he has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Jacobs, Hoffman and Spaeth, JJ., concur in the result for the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Bowes, 233 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, 335 A.2d 718 (1975).

Commonwealth v. Stroup, 334 A.2d 292, 234 Pa. Super. 70, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1503 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

334 A.2d 292 (Commonwealth v. Stroup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related