Commonwealth v. Stroup

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Stroup

334 A.2d 292, 234 Pa. Super. 70, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1503

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 31, 1975

DocketAppeal, No. 1176

StatusPublished

This text of 334 A.2d 292 (Commonwealth v. Stroup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Stroup, 334 A.2d 292, 234 Pa. Super. 70, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1503 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court com[71]*71mitted until he has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Jacobs, Hoffman and Spaeth, JJ., concur in the result for the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Bowes, 233 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, 335 A.2d 718 (1975).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Judgment of sentence affirmed and the defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court com[71]*71mitted until he has complied with the sentence, or any part thereof which has not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Jacobs, Hoffman and Spaeth, JJ., concur in the result for the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Bowes, 233 Pa. Superior Ct. 71, 335 A.2d 718 (1975).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

334 A.2d 292, 234 Pa. Super. 70, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-stroup-pasuperct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack