Commonwealth v. Strader

696 A.2d 151, 548 Pa. 208, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1346
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 16, 1997·No. Petitioner 0036 Western District Allocatur Docket 1997·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 1997, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, BUT LIMITED to the following issue:

whether the Super. Ct. erred in holding that the evidence should not be suppressed where the affidavit in support of the search warrant contained false statements about the reliability of the confidential informant, and whether counsel was ineffective for failure to move to suppress.

Additionally, this case is hereby REMANDED to the trial court so that a hearing may be conducted to determine whether the false information in question was knowingly included in the affidavit in support of the search warrant. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Strader, 696 A.2d 151, 548 Pa. 208, 1997 Pa. LEXIS 1346 (Pa. 1997).

696 A.2d 151 (Commonwealth v. Strader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ranocchia, A. & J. v. Erie Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Commonwealth v. Jackson
785 A.2d 117 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
Whiteford v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
782 A.2d 1127 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2001)
Cranberry Park Associates v. Cranberry Township Zoning Hearing Board
751 A.2d 165 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)