Commonwealth v. Stone

264 A.2d 406, 437 Pa. 496, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 907
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 16, 1970·No. 3082-A, Miscellaneous Docket·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Petitioner’s counsel in the Superior Court filed no brief and has filed an inadequate petition for allowance of appeal with this Court. This is not the “representation in the role of an advocate” which we require. See Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 675, 78 *498 S. Ct. 974, 2 L. Ed. 2d 1060 (1958); Commonwealth v. Stein, 436 Pa. 330, 260 A. 2d 467 (1969). Accordingly, the petition for allocatur is granted, the order of the Superior Court is vacated and the case remanded so that the Superior Court may consider the appeal upon the filing of a brief properly prepared by counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Stone, 264 A.2d 406, 437 Pa. 496, 1970 Pa. LEXIS 907 (Pa. 1970).

264 A.2d 406 (Commonwealth v. Stone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Stoyko
475 A.2d 714 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth v. Swint
412 A.2d 507 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1980)
Commonwealth v. Sullivan
371 A.2d 468 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)