Commonwealth v. Still
239 A.2d 814, 212 Pa. Super. 709, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1194
This text of 239 A.2d 814 (Commonwealth v. Still) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Still, 239 A.2d 814, 212 Pa. Super. 709, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1194 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).
Opinion
In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order of the court below is reversed and the record is remitted with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Hoffman
232 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 A.2d 814, 212 Pa. Super. 709, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-still-pasuperct-1968.