Commonwealth v. Stevenson

50 A. 91, 200 Pa. 509, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 523
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 11, 1901·No. Appeal, No. 51·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Pee Cubiam,

The findings of fact and the opinion considered in connection with them resulted in an ouster of the five defendants who appealed from the judgment of the court of common pleas No. 3, and now solicit a reinstatement to the offices from which they were removed. It is alleged by the defendants that the court erred in the matters referred to in the specifications, and that the ouster complained of was unauthorized and unwarranted, The specifications do not convince us of error as claimed by the defendants but that the ouster entered by the learned judge of the court below was fully warranted. We therefore dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment of the court.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Stevenson, 50 A. 91, 200 Pa. 509, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 523 (Pa. 1901).

50 A. 91 (Commonwealth v. Stevenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curwood v. Curwood
38 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 (Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, 1964)
Commonwealth ex rel. Markovitz v. Trans-United Industries, Inc.
23 Pa. D. & C.2d 571 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)
Commonwealth v. Luker
102 A. 276 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
People, ex rel. Wildi v. Ittner
165 Ill. App. 360 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1911)
Commonwealth v. Bowditch
66 A. 867 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)