Commonwealth v. Stello

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Stello

202 A.2d 71, 415 Pa. 572, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 497

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 1, 1964

DocketAppeals, No. 283

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.2d 71 (Commonwealth v. Stello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Stello, 202 A.2d 71, 415 Pa. 572, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 497 (Pa. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Stello was convicted in two summary proceedings before a Justice of the Peace of separate violations of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended, 75 PS §101 et seq. Prom these summary convictions Stello appealed to the Court of Quarter Sessions which, after hearing and convictions, imposed fines on him for each of his violations of The Vehicle Code. In one case Stello took an appeal to the Superior Court which certified the appeal to this Court where it was consolidated with the other appeal which was taken directly to this Court. Although appellant has been granted several continuances, he did not appear personally or by counsel to argue his appeals, but submitted his case and his contentions on briefs.

We have examined all of Stello’s contentions in the light of the record and find no merit in any of them.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Stello was convicted in two summary proceedings before a Justice of the Peace of separate violations of The Vehicle Code of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended, 75 PS §101 et seq. Prom these summary convictions Stello appealed to the Court of Quarter Sessions which, after hearing and convictions, imposed fines on him for each of his violations of The Vehicle Code. In one case Stello took an appeal to the Superior Court which certified the appeal to this Court where it was consolidated with the other appeal which was taken directly to this Court. Although appellant has been granted several continuances, he did not appear personally or by counsel to argue his appeals, but submitted his case and his contentions on briefs.

We have examined all of Stello’s contentions in the light of the record and find no merit in any of them.

Judgments affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.2d 71, 415 Pa. 572, 1964 Pa. LEXIS 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-stello-pa-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack