Commonwealth v. Steich

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Steich

268 A.2d 463, 217 Pa. Super. 770, 1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1512

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 6, 1970

DocketAppeal, No. 484

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.2d 463 (Commonwealth v. Steich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Steich, 268 A.2d 463, 217 Pa. Super. 770, 1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1512 (Pa. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order of the court below is vacated and the record remanded so that appellant may amend the post-conviction petition of May 6, 1969, to allege any extraordinary circumstances which justify the failure to raise his new allegations on his prior petition. Post Conviction Hearing Act, Section 4(b) (2), Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, 19 P.S. §1180-4(b) (2) (Supp. 1970). See Commonwealth v. Satchell, 430 Pa. 443, 243 A. 2d 381 (1968).

Wright, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order of the court below is vacated and the record remanded so that appellant may amend the post-conviction petition of May 6, 1969, to allege any extraordinary circumstances which justify the failure to raise his new allegations on his prior petition. Post Conviction Hearing Act, Section 4(b) (2), Act of January 25, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1580, 19 P.S. §1180-4(b) (2) (Supp. 1970). See Commonwealth v. Satchell, 430 Pa. 443, 243 A. 2d 381 (1968).

Wright, P. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.2d 463, 217 Pa. Super. 770, 1970 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-steich-pasuperct-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack