Commonwealth v. Sprenger
5 Binn. 353, 1812 Pa. LEXIS 70
Opinion
There certainly are inconveniences arising from delay in a case of .this kind; but we must not permit ourselves to overthrow well established principles of law, to facilitate a particular suit. The defendants are not in court in this suit. The rule to shew cause was intended to obtain leave to institute the action. It is now commenced by the information. The relators must proceed by venire to the next term.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Sprenger, 5 Binn. 353, 1812 Pa. LEXIS 70 (Pa. 1812).
5 Binn. 353 (Commonwealth v. Sprenger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hambleton v. People ex rel. Young
44 Ill. 458 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1867)
People v. Richardson
4 Cow. 97 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)