Commonwealth v. Spitzer
437 A.2d 768, 292 Pa. Super. 466, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3999
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary conviction for reckless driving. A review of the record discloses that the appellant failed to file any post-trial motions. Consistent with this court’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Koch, 288 Pa.Super. 290, 431 A.2d 1052 (1981) and the comment to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123 (effective July 1, 1981), we remand for the filing of post-tri *467 al motions. We also remand for compliance with Pa.R.A.P. rules 1923 and 1925.
Case remanded. We are not retaining jurisdiction over this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Spitzer, 437 A.2d 768, 292 Pa. Super. 466, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3999 (Pa. Ct. App. 1981).
437 A.2d 768 (Commonwealth v. Spitzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Schildt
450 A.2d 74 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Cogan
449 A.2d 624 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Ferrone
448 A.2d 637 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)