Commonwealth v. Spitzer
This text of 437 A.2d 768 (Commonwealth v. Spitzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a summary conviction for reckless driving. A review of the record discloses that the appellant failed to file any post-trial motions. Consistent with this court’s opinion in Commonwealth v. Koch, 288 Pa.Super. 290, 431 A.2d 1052 (1981) and the comment to Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123 (effective July 1, 1981), we remand for the filing of post-tri *467 al motions. We also remand for compliance with Pa.R.A.P. rules 1923 and 1925.
Case remanded. We are not retaining jurisdiction over this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 A.2d 768, 292 Pa. Super. 466, 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-spitzer-pasuperct-1981.