Commonwealth v. Spence

65 A.3d 913
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 29, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as phrased by Petitioner, is:

[914] Did a state trooper violate the Wiretap Act when he listened through the speaker on an informant’s cellular telephone as the informant arranged a drug deal with the defendant?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Spence, 65 A.3d 913 (Pa. 2013).

65 A.3d 913 (Commonwealth v. Spence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Spence
91 A.3d 44 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)