Commonwealth v. South

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Commonwealth v. South

9 Ky. 237, 2 A.K. Marsh. 237, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 27

DecidedApril 24, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Ky. 237 (Commonwealth v. South) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. South, 9 Ky. 237, 2 A.K. Marsh. 237, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Madison circuit court, quashing a presentment made by the grand jury at the September term, 1817.

The presentment charges, that the justices of the county court of said county did not, at any time within the year last past, fix the rates and prices to be paid at all or any of the taverns within said county, for liquors, &c. and that Samuel South, during the year aforesaid, was, and continues to be, one of the said commonwealth’s justices of the peace, and failed to fix the rates and prices during the year aforesaid.

This presentment, we are of opinion, is defective in not alledging that there were taverns in the county; for as the act of assembly, under which the presentment was made, only requires the justices of the county courts to fix the rates and prices to be paid at all taverns within their respective [238]*238counties, it is evident if there be no taverns within a county, the failure of the justices of that county to fix the rates is no breach of the law. And whether taverns exist or not, in a county, is certainly not a matter of law but a matter of fact, and, consequently, to make out the offence, the fact should be charged in the presentment. We think, therefore, without noticing other objections taken to the presentment in this case, that it was properly quashed.

The judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chief Justice

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Madison circuit court, quashing a presentment made by the grand jury at the September term, 1817.

The presentment charges, that the justices of the county court of said county did not, at any time within the year last past, fix the rates and prices to be paid at all or any of the taverns within said county, for liquors, &c. and that Samuel South, during the year aforesaid, was, and continues to be, one of the said commonwealth’s justices of the peace, and failed to fix the rates and prices during the year aforesaid.

This presentment, we are of opinion, is defective in not alledging that there were taverns in the county; for as the act of assembly, under which the presentment was made, only requires the justices of the county courts to fix the rates and prices to be paid at all taverns within their respective [238]*238counties, it is evident if there be no taverns within a county, the failure of the justices of that county to fix the rates is no breach of the law. And whether taverns exist or not, in a county, is certainly not a matter of law but a matter of fact, and, consequently, to make out the offence, the fact should be charged in the presentment. We think, therefore, without noticing other objections taken to the presentment in this case, that it was properly quashed.

The judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Ky. 237, 2 A.K. Marsh. 237, 1820 Ky. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-south-kyctapp-1820.