Commonwealth v. Soto

657 A.2d 40, 441 Pa. Super. 241, 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 994

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1995·No. Appeal No. 1050·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed in part and vacated in part.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

OLSZEWSKI, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Soto, 657 A.2d 40, 441 Pa. Super. 241, 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 994 (Pa. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

657 A.2d 40 (Commonwealth v. Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.