Commonwealth v. Soto

657 A.2d 40, 441 Pa. Super. 241, 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 994
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 17, 1995
DocketAppeal No. 1050
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 657 A.2d 40 (Commonwealth v. Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Soto, 657 A.2d 40, 441 Pa. Super. 241, 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 994 (Pa. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed in part and vacated in part.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

OLSZEWSKI, J., filed a concurring opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Com. v. Gonzalez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2016
Com. v. Gesslein,A.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014
Commonwealth v. Smith
97 A.3d 782 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)
Commonwealth v. Gesslein
36 Pa. D. & C.5th 225 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 A.2d 40, 441 Pa. Super. 241, 1995 Pa. Super. LEXIS 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-soto-pasuperct-1995.