Commonwealth v. Solomon

413 A.2d 657, 488 Pa. 622, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 605
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 25, 1980·No. No. 87·Published

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

LARSEN, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County denying appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief. Appellant argues that his trial/direct appeal counsel1 was ineffective in several respects, namely:

1. For failure to object to, or motion for a mistrial because of, allegedly prejudicial remarks of the prosecutor during his closing arguments;
[624]*6242. For failure to request an instruction to the jury on involuntary manslaughter; and
3. for failure to call certain witnesses in his behalf.

We have examined the record and conclude that these issues are without merit. Accordingly, judgments of sentence affirmed.

EAGEN, C. J., notes a dissent and would grant a new trial because of prosecutorial misconduct. ROBERTS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Solomon, 413 A.2d 657, 488 Pa. 622, 1980 Pa. LEXIS 605 (Pa. 1980).

413 A.2d 657 (Commonwealth v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Smith
379 A.2d 96 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. Maroney
235 A.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
Commonwealth v. Cliff
397 A.2d 1173 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
Commonwealth v. Solomon
370 A.2d 372 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Gilman
368 A.2d 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Garcia
378 A.2d 1199 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Commonwealth v. Capalla
185 A. 203 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)