Commonwealth v. Smith, V.
This text of Commonwealth v. Smith, V. (Commonwealth v. Smith, V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 197 WAL 2023 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : VINCENT SMITH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Did the en banc panel erroneously hold that the unit of prosecution for the offense of arson endangering persons, 18 Pa. C.S. § 3301(a)(1)(i), is not each arson, but, rather, each endangered person, a question of first impression and substantial public importance that will impact myriad arson prosecutions throughout the Commonwealth going forward?
Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Smith, V., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-smith-v-pa-2024.