Commonwealth v. Smith

138 Mass. 489, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 231
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 8, 1885·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Morton, C. J.

The keeper of a house of ill-fame may be punished either under the Pub. Sts. c. 207, § 13, or under c. 101, § 7. Commonwealth v. Ballou, 124 Mass. 26.

The complaint in the case at bar was brought under the Pub. Sts. e. 207, § 13, which provides that the keeper of a house of ill-fame shall be punished by imprisonment in the jail not exceeding two years. The defendant contends that the Municipal Court of the city of Boston has not jurisdiction of this offence. The Pub. Sts. e. 154, § 50, provide that the original criminal jurisdiction of that court “ shall include all crimes under the degree of felony,” with certain exceptions not affecting this case. As the offence charged in this case is not a felony, it follows that it is within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court of the city of Boston. Pub. Sts. c. 210, § 1.

Exceptions overruled'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Smith, 138 Mass. 489, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 231 (Mass. 1885).

138 Mass. 489 (Commonwealth v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solomon v. United States
297 F. 82 (First Circuit, 1924)
Commonwealth v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
92 N.E. 766 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Ex parte Brown
151 F. 710 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1907)