Commonwealth v. Smith

53 Mass. 238
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 53 Mass. 238 (Commonwealth v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Smith, 53 Mass. 238 (Mass. 1847).

Opinion

Shaw, C. J.

The question in the present case is, whether a co-defendant, who has pleaded guilty, but has not been sentenced, can be called as a witness for the prosecution.

It has been held, that a co-defendant, who has not been tried, cannot be called as a witness for one put on trial separately. Commonwealth v. Marsh, 10 Pick. 57. So it has been held, in New York, that a party in the same indictment cannot be a witness for his co-defendant, upon his trial, until he has been acquitted or convicted. The People v. Bill, 10 Johns. 95. But the reason does not apply to one who, by conviction on his own confession, has ceased to be a party to the issue to be tried. Rex v. Fletcher, 1 Stra. 633. And in a late case, where a co-defendant had pleaded guilty to a charge of house breaking, and was called as a witness, before sentence, he was admitted. Regina v. George, Car. & Marshm. 111. See also 1 Phil. &. Amos on Ev. 29, 70.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bill
10 Johns. 95 (New York Supreme Court, 1813)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Mass. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-smith-mass-1847.