Commonwealth v. Smith
This text of 53 Mass. 238 (Commonwealth v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question in the present case is, whether a co-defendant, who has pleaded guilty, but has not been sentenced, can be called as a witness for the prosecution.
It has been held, that a co-defendant, who has not been tried, cannot be called as a witness for one put on trial separately. Commonwealth v. Marsh, 10 Pick. 57. So it has been held, in New York, that a party in the same indictment cannot be a witness for his co-defendant, upon his trial, until he has been acquitted or convicted. The People v. Bill, 10 Johns. 95. But the reason does not apply to one who, by conviction on his own confession, has ceased to be a party to the issue to be tried. Rex v. Fletcher, 1 Stra. 633. And in a late case, where a co-defendant had pleaded guilty to a charge of house breaking, and was called as a witness, before sentence, he was admitted. Regina v. George, Car. & Marshm. 111. See also 1 Phil. &. Amos on Ev. 29, 70.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 Mass. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-smith-mass-1847.