Commonwealth v. Smith, L.
This text of Commonwealth v. Smith, L. (Commonwealth v. Smith, L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 410 MAL 2021 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : LISA SMITH, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 15th day of December, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:
(1) Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the trial court’s admission of the statement of Petitioner’s co-defendant in violation of this Court’s precedent interpreting Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), specifically Commonwealth v. Rainey, 928 A.2d 216 (Pa. 2007) and Commonwealth v. Johnson, 378 A.2d 859 (Pa. 1977)?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Smith, L., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-smith-l-pa-2021.