Commonwealth v. Smith, B.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Smith, B.

203 A.3d 210

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 26, 2019·No. 451 EAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict Petitioner for violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105 because he was specifically convicted under § 6105(c), and the Commonwealth failed to prove that he was a "fugitive from justice" as that term is meant in § 6105(c)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM .

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Did not the Superior Court err in finding the evidence sufficient to convict Petitioner for violating 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6105 because he was specifically convicted under § 6105(c), and the Commonwealth failed to prove that he was a "fugitive from justice" as that term is meant in § 6105(c)?

Commonwealth v. Smith, B., 203 A.3d 210 (Pa. 2019).

Pincite

203 A.3d 210 (Commonwealth v. Smith, B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related