Commonwealth v. Small

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Small

381 A.2d 136, 475 Pa. 556, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 926

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 23, 1977

DocketNo. 304

StatusPublished

This text of 381 A.2d 136 (Commonwealth v. Small) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Small, 381 A.2d 136, 475 Pa. 556, 1977 Pa. LEXIS 926 (Pa. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

Appellant, Gail J. Small, was tried by a judge sitting without a jury in connection with the homicide of Harvey Wilson. Appellant was found guilty of murder of the third degree. Post-verdict motions were denied and appellant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one and one-half to eighteen years. This appeal followed.

Appellant’s only argument is that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction of murder of the third degree. We have reviewed the evidence in the instant case and find sufficient evidence to sustain appellant’s conviction of murder of the third degree. See Commonwealth v. Rose, 463 Pa. 264, 344 A.2d 824 (1975).

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI