Commonwealth v. Small, E.
207 A.3d 289
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 23, 2019·No. 559 EAL 2018 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
AND NOW, this 23 rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issues set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issues, as stated by petitioner, are:
(1) Where Small did not receive notice of his co-defendant Larry Bell's 1993 PCRA hearing, and where Small has been continuously incarcerated, with only limited assistance of counsel on unrelated claims since that time, was Bell's PCRA testimony "unknown" to Small under Commonwealth v. Burton [,638 Pa. 687 ,158 A.3d 618 (2017)]?
(2) Has Small otherwise satisfied the requirements for an exception to the PCRA time-bar under [42 Pa.C.S.] § 9545(b)(1)(ii) based on his co-defendant Bell's PCRA testimony, such that the PCRA court's grant of a new trial should be reinstated?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Small, E., 207 A.3d 289 (Pa. 2019).
207 A.3d 289 (Commonwealth v. Small, E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2020