Commonwealth v. Skopinski, of: S. Wilder
This text of Commonwealth v. Skopinski, of: S. Wilder (Commonwealth v. Skopinski, of: S. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 131 MM 2020
v.
JOHN SKOPINSKI
PETITION OF: STUART WILDER, ESQUIRE
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, as it appears that this Court's
Prothonotary was mistaken in concluding that Stuart Wilder, Esquire, presently
represents John Skopinski, the "Application to Withdraw Appearance as Counsel" is
DISMISSED.
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to process the previously submitted pro se filing
in the normal course, including issuing any defect -correction notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Skopinski, of: S. Wilder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-skopinski-of-s-wilder-pa-2020.