Commonwealth v. Sistrunk
942 A.2d 896, 942 A.2d 895, 596 Pa. 263, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 120
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 2008·No. Appeal 478 MAL 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the case REMANDED to the trial court for reinstatement of the jury’s verdict. See Commonwealth v. Ratsamy, 934 A.2d 1233 (Pa.2007).
Jurisdiction relinquished.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Sistrunk, 942 A.2d 896, 942 A.2d 895, 596 Pa. 263, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 120 (Pa. 2008).
942 A.2d 896 (Commonwealth v. Sistrunk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Schwartz v. Griffin
942 A.2d 896 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2008)