Commonwealth v. Sisak
241 A.2d 366, 212 Pa. Super. 732, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1250
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Sisak. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 Pa. Super. 255 →
Opinion
The order of the court below is vacated and the record is remanded to the court below with instructions to hold a hearing at which appellant’s contentions relating to the absence of representation of counsel at trial may be determined. See Commonwealth ex rel. O’Lock v. Rundle, 415 Pa. 515, 204 A. 2d 439 (1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Sisak, 241 A.2d 366, 212 Pa. Super. 732, 1968 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1250 (Pa. Ct. App. 1968).
241 A.2d 366 (Commonwealth v. Sisak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Lock v. Rundle
204 A.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)