Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt. Read the opinion of the Court — 631 Pa. 423
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 25, 2015·No. 493 CAP·Published

Opinion

[J-81-2014][M.O. – Todd, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 493 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Order entered on : 10/18/05 in the Court of Common Pleas of : Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, v. : denying PCRA relief at No. 9611-0316 1/2 : : RASHEED SIMPSON, : : SUBMITTED FOLLOWING REMAND: Appellant : August 13, 2014

DISSENTING OPINION

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: March 25, 2015

Although I agree with the majority’s determinations regarding the two remand

issues, I am unable to join in the affirmance of the order concluding the post-conviction

proceedings, for the reasons set forth in my previous dissent. See Commonwealth v.

Simpson, 620 Pa. 60, 112-15, 66 A.3d 253, 284-85 (2013) (Saylor, J., dissenting)

(explaining that Appellant did not receive the process he was due under the governing

scheme for post-conviction review).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt, (Pa. 2015).

Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt (Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Simpson
66 A.3d 253 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)