Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt
Opinion
[J-81-2014][M.O. – Todd, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 493 CAP : Appellee : Appeal from the Order entered on : 10/18/05 in the Court of Common Pleas of : Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, v. : denying PCRA relief at No. 9611-0316 1/2 : : RASHEED SIMPSON, : : SUBMITTED FOLLOWING REMAND: Appellant : August 13, 2014
DISSENTING OPINION
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR DECIDED: March 25, 2015
Although I agree with the majority’s determinations regarding the two remand
issues, I am unable to join in the affirmance of the order concluding the post-conviction
proceedings, for the reasons set forth in my previous dissent. See Commonwealth v.
Simpson, 620 Pa. 60, 112-15, 66 A.3d 253, 284-85 (2013) (Saylor, J., dissenting)
(explaining that Appellant did not receive the process he was due under the governing
scheme for post-conviction review).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt (Commonwealth v. Simpson, R., Aplt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.