Commonwealth v. Simpson

254 A.2d 306, 434 Pa. 439, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 475
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 28, 1969·No. Appeal, 208·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant attacks the validity of his guilty plea on the ground that he had been promised a lesser sentence by his trial counsel. The statements of counsel in the record indicate the contrary. The burden of proving an illegal inducement of a guilty plea falls on appellant when the record of a colloquy clearly shows a valid plea. Commonwealth v. Grays, 428 Pa. 109, 237 A. 2d 198 (1968). The existence of the record here makes the application of Commonwealth v. Finney, 433 Pa. 152, 249 A. 2d 286 (1969), inappropriate.

Appellant further contends that the hearing judge erred in not calling appellant’s trial counsel to testify. Appellant, however, requested neither their testimony nor their attendance. A hearing judge is not required to call witnesses of his own initiative. Considering the state of the record and the applicable burdens, there is no error.

Order affirmed.

Mr, Justice Jones concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Simpson, 254 A.2d 306, 434 Pa. 439, 1969 Pa. LEXIS 475 (Pa. 1969).

254 A.2d 306 (Commonwealth v. Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Carey
340 A.2d 509 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1975)
Commonwealth v. Musser
286 A.2d 651 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)