Commonwealth v. Silverman

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Silverman

279 A.2d 83, 2 Pa. Commw. 538, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 484

CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 29, 1971

DocketAppeal No. 203 C. D. 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 279 A.2d 83 (Commonwealth v. Silverman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Silverman, 279 A.2d 83, 2 Pa. Commw. 538, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 484 (Pa. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, dated October 20, 1970, which sustained the appeal of Kenneth M. Silverman from a suspension of three months imposed by the Secretary of Revenue (now the Secretary of Transportation).

By a host of authorities, the Courts of Common Pleas, in appeals arising from the suspension of operator’s licenses, are directed to hear such cases de novo. See The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. §620, and Annot., 97 A.L.R. 2d 1367, 1371-1372 (1964).

The Common Pleas judge has the duty to make findings of fact both (1) where there is disputed or credible conflicting testimony, and (2) where there is undisputed testimony but extenuating facts and circumstances are submitted. Commonwealth v. Emerick, 373 [540]*540Pa. 388, 96 A. 2d 370 (1953); Commonwealth v. Strobel, 375 Pa. 292, 100 A. 2d 43 (1953), same case, 378 Pa. 84, 105 A. 2d 152 (1954).

v In the instant casé, the' Judge failed to make spe-’ cific findings of fact,' nor did he specifically state conclusions of law; How, then, is this Court, to fulfill its' duty “to determine whether the findings of the court below are1 supported by competent evidence and to correct any erroneous conclusions of ldwv?" Bee: Commonwealth v. James F. McCartney, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 540, 279 A. 2d 77 (1971), and cases cited therein. We are particularly interested in receiving specific findings of the facts surrounding appellee’s request for a’ continuance, if any, and why it was not granted.

. Therefore, in keeping with this opinion, we issue the following

Order ,

Ajstd Now, June 29, 1971, the. record in this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County for appropriate findings of. fact and conclusions of. law and for the entry of an order, based thereon, which sustains or reverses the action of the Secretary. c»f Revenue (now the Secretary of Transportation).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This is an appeal from an Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, dated October 20, 1970, which sustained the appeal of Kenneth M. Silverman from a suspension of three months imposed by the Secretary of Revenue (now the Secretary of Transportation).

By a host of authorities, the Courts of Common Pleas, in appeals arising from the suspension of operator’s licenses, are directed to hear such cases de novo. See The Vehicle Code, Act of April 29, 1959, P. L. 58, as amended, 75 P.S. §620, and Annot., 97 A.L.R. 2d 1367, 1371-1372 (1964).

The Common Pleas judge has the duty to make findings of fact both (1) where there is disputed or credible conflicting testimony, and (2) where there is undisputed testimony but extenuating facts and circumstances are submitted. Commonwealth v. Emerick, 373 [540]*540Pa. 388, 96 A. 2d 370 (1953); Commonwealth v. Strobel, 375 Pa. 292, 100 A. 2d 43 (1953), same case, 378 Pa. 84, 105 A. 2d 152 (1954).

v In the instant casé, the' Judge failed to make spe-’ cific findings of fact,' nor did he specifically state conclusions of law; How, then, is this Court, to fulfill its' duty “to determine whether the findings of the court below are1 supported by competent evidence and to correct any erroneous conclusions of ldwv?" Bee: Commonwealth v. James F. McCartney, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 540, 279 A. 2d 77 (1971), and cases cited therein. We are particularly interested in receiving specific findings of the facts surrounding appellee’s request for a’ continuance, if any, and why it was not granted.

. Therefore, in keeping with this opinion, we issue the following

Order ,

Ajstd Now, June 29, 1971, the. record in this case is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County for appropriate findings of. fact and conclusions of. law and for the entry of an order, based thereon, which sustains or reverses the action of the Secretary. c»f Revenue (now the Secretary of Transportation).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.2d 83, 2 Pa. Commw. 538, 1971 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-silverman-pacommwct-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack