Commonwealth v. Siderias

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Siderias

235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 16, 1967·No. Appeal, No. 507·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.

The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”

For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.

The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”

For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Siderias, 235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734 (Pa. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

235 A.2d 181 (Commonwealth v. Siderias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related