Commonwealth v. Siderias

235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 16, 1967
DocketAppeal, No. 507
StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.2d 181 (Commonwealth v. Siderias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Siderias, 235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734 (Pa. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.

The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”

For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Herb
235 A.2d 429 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-siderias-pasuperct-1967.