Commonwealth v. Siderias
This text of 235 A.2d 181 (Commonwealth v. Siderias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This case presents the identical questions raised in Com. v. Herb, 211 Pa. Superior Ct. 119, 235 A. 2d 429, which we have decided in an opinion filed concurrently herewith.
The only difference between the cases was that Herb was accused of “following too closely” while Siderias was charged with “unreasonable and improper speed.”
For the reasons set forth in Com. v. Herb, supra, the order of the court below is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.2d 181, 211 Pa. Super. 125, 1967 Pa. Super. LEXIS 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-siderias-pasuperct-1967.