Commonwealth v. Shivers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Shivers

15 Pa. Super. 579, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 392

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 22, 1901

DocketAppeals, Nos. 258 and 259

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 15 Pa. Super. 579 (Commonwealth v. Shivers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Shivers, 15 Pa. Super. 579, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 392 (Pa. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Whether the refusal to order the district attorney to file a bill of particulars in a criminal case is reviewable on appeal or is a matter purely discretionary with the court below, is a question upon which we express no opinion at this time. Granting that the action of the court is reviewable, it is beyond all question an interlocutory order. No definitive judgment having been entered, the appeals must be quashed.

The rules are made absolute and the appeals quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Whether the refusal to order the district attorney to file a bill of particulars in a criminal case is reviewable on appeal or is a matter purely discretionary with the court below, is a question upon which we express no opinion at this time. Granting that the action of the court is reviewable, it is beyond all question an interlocutory order. No definitive judgment having been entered, the appeals must be quashed.

The rules are made absolute and the appeals quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Pa. Super. 579, 1901 Pa. Super. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-shivers-pasuperct-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack