Commonwealth v. Shifflett
This text of 20 Va. Cir. 46 (Commonwealth v. Shifflett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Loudoun County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came to be heard upon the defendant’s Motion to Quash the Indictment and Plea of Former Jeopardy.
The defendant’s Motion to Quash is denied, and his Plea is overruled.
Since the General District Court Judge dismissed the original felony charge for lack of probable cause, there was no final adjudication on the merits. Moore v. Commonwealth, 218 Va. 388, 390 (1977). It follows that no jeopardy having attached at the preliminary hearing, no double jeopardy ensued when the defendant was subsequently indicted.
Distribution as an accommodation is not a lesser included offense of the felonious distribution of marijuana. Stillwell, et al. v. Commonwealth, 219 Va. 214 (1978). Accordingly, the General District Court Judge has no authority to arraign the defendant on that charge. Accordingly, the Commonwealth’s motion to nolle prosequi was of no legal consequence. The dismissal of the original felony charge served only to discharge the defendant, leaving to the Commonwealth the right to seek the instant indictment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Va. Cir. 46, 1989 Va. Cir. LEXIS 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-shifflett-vaccloudoun-1989.