Commonwealth v. Sherrit
This text of 3 Ky. Op. 421 (Commonwealth v. Sherrit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
The appellee, William Sherrit, as surety in the recognizance for the appearance of Frank Sherrit at the October term, 1868. might, by motion, have been entitled to a vacation of the payment of the forfeiture had he filed his affidavit during that term, but, at the subsequent term when he made the application, the court had no jurisdiction except that of discretionary remission given by the 94th section of the Criminal Code which requires that before such remission, the accused shall, by voluntary surrender [422]*422or otherwise, be in the custody of the court. Consequently, as the record does not show this indisputable prerequisite, the judgment of remission was unauthorized and erroneous. Commonwealth vs. Rowland, 4th Met.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a judgment consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. Op. 421, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-sherrit-kyctapp-1869.