Commonwealth v. Shelpman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Shelpman

804 A.2d 1209

DecidedAugust 13, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 804 A.2d 1209 (Commonwealth v. Shelpman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Shelpman, 804 A.2d 1209 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the Superior Court’s conclusion that Petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim was not cognizable under the PCRA, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for consideration of the merits of Petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim. See Commonwealth ex rel. Dadario v. Goldberg, 565 Pa. 280, 773 A.2d 126 (2001).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2002, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED, LIMITED to the Superior Court’s conclusion that Petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim was not cognizable under the PCRA, the Order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED for consideration of the merits of Petitioner’s ineffective assistance claim. See Commonwealth ex rel. Dadario v. Goldberg, 565 Pa. 280, 773 A.2d 126 (2001).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

804 A.2d 1209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-shelpman-pa-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack