Commonwealth v. Shea

23 N.E. 47, 150 Mass. 314, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 89
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 21, 1889·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Devens, J.

The motion of the defendant to quash the complaint is based upon the theory that its allegations are vague and indefinite, and also that no unlawful and criminal intent on the part of the defendant is alleged. The allegations as to the place where and the time when the offence was committed are entirely specific, and no allegation of an unlawful or criminal intent was necessary. The statute expressly forbids the act which the defendant was charged with committing, and the complaint follows its language. Whether the defendant intended [315] to violate the statute or not, if she committed the act charged she was liable to the penalty which was imposed thereby. Pub. Sts. c. 207, § 13. Commonwealth v. Farren, 9 Allen, 489. Commonwealth v. Waite, 11 Allen, 264. The motion was properly overruled. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Shea, 23 N.E. 47, 150 Mass. 314, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 89 (Mass. 1889).

23 N.E. 47 (Commonwealth v. Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Mixer
93 N.E. 249 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
State v. Cambron
105 N.W. 241 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Commonwealth v. Connelly
40 N.E. 862 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)