Commonwealth v. Shankes
This text of 6 Ky. Op. 79 (Commonwealth v. Shankes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
The order dismissing the case against Shankes was á final judgment and from which an appeal could have been prosecuted. The mandate of the court of appeals had been entered of record in the lower court, reversing the judgment rendered against the appellee and thereby that judgment was rendered inoperative and no execution could have properly issued upon it. After the reversal the judgment was a mere nullity and the failure of the court below to set it aside gave it no vitality.
The opinion delivered by the circuit' judge and made part of the record is conclusive of the question presented.
The judgment of the court below is therefore affirmed. The rule against Judge Cofer is discharged as he has no right to investigate the case on the docket at a time after there was a final judgment and over which he had no control.
-, for appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Ky. Op. 79, 1872 Ky. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-shankes-kyctapp-1872.