Commonwealth v. Sesso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Sesso

95 Pa. Super. 552, 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 78

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 4, 1929·No. Appeal 30·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per. Curiam,

Defendant was convicted before the magistrate of vagrancy under the Act of Assembly of May 8, 1876, P. L. 154. The court of quarter sessions allowed an appeal, heard the case and entered an order affirming the judgment. An order which merely affirms the judgment of the magistrate will be reversed: Com. v. Congdon, 74 Pa. Superior Ct. 286; Com. v. Bickel, 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 348; Com. v. Oliver, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 580.

Now, March 5, 1929, the record is remitted in order that the proper judgment may be entered.

A similar order is directed to be entered in No. 29, February T., 1929.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per. Curiam,

Defendant was convicted before the magistrate of vagrancy under the Act of Assembly of May 8, 1876, P. L. 154. The court of quarter sessions allowed an appeal, heard the case and entered an order affirming the judgment. An order which merely affirms the judgment of the magistrate will be reversed: Com. v. Congdon, 74 Pa. Superior Ct. 286; Com. v. Bickel, 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 348; Com. v. Oliver, 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 580.

Now, March 5, 1929, the record is remitted in order that the proper judgment may be entered.

A similar order is directed to be entered in No. 29, February T., 1929.

Commonwealth v. Sesso, 95 Pa. Super. 552, 1929 Pa. Super. LEXIS 78 (Pa. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

95 Pa. Super. 552 (Commonwealth v. Sesso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related