Commonwealth v. Senoski, K.
This text of Commonwealth v. Senoski, K. (Commonwealth v. Senoski, K.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 60 WM 2018 : Respondent : : : v. : : : KENNETH A. SENOSKI, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED. The Petition for Writ of Mandamus, Request for Appointment of
Counsel, and Request for Leave to Allow New Document are DENIED.
Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Senoski, K., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-senoski-k-pa-2018.