Commonwealth v. Semmes
This text of 11 Va. 665 (Commonwealth v. Semmes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court is of opinion, that the testimony' in this case shews, that the petitioner has contracted a painful and dangerous‘disease, since his confinement in jail, which disease was the consequence of his having been for a long time confined in a very small, very damp, and very badly ventilated room, and which disease had reduced him so low at the late term of the circuit superior court of Albemarle, as to render it improper, in the opinion of that court, to put him upon his trial; and that since the late term of that court, the petitioner has either contracted a new disease, or the old one has been so aggravated, as to render it certain, that his longer confinement must prove injurious to him, by greatly increasing his disease, and will, in all human probability, cause it to terminate fatally. The court is, therefore, of opinion, that the petitioner shews himself entitled to be bailed, and ought to be admitted to bail upon finding two or more sureties to the amount of 23,000 dollars, — • and being an infant, he is not to be required to enter into a recognizance himself.
Note.- — The state of the prisoner’s health appearing to be such, that, probably', he could not now be safely removed, the court, therefore, did not order a habeas corpus to bring him before it, but only entered its opinion on record, that he ought to be admitted to bail; and then, Thompson, J., admitted him to bail accordingly, in Albe-marle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 Va. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-semmes-vagensess-1841.