Commonwealth v. Segida

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Segida

937 A.2d 419, 594 Pa. 524, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2504

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 28, 2007·No. Appeal 61 WAL 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*525 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) In finding insufficient evidence to support the [75 Pa. C.S.] § 3802(a)(1) DUI offense, did [the] Superior Court err in determining what the elements are for a [Section 3802(a)(1)] DUI offense and err in concluding it is an “at the time of driving” offense?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*525 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

(1) In finding insufficient evidence to support the [75 Pa. C.S.] § 3802(a)(1) DUI offense, did [the] Superior Court err in determining what the elements are for a [Section 3802(a)(1)] DUI offense and err in concluding it is an “at the time of driving” offense?

Commonwealth v. Segida, 937 A.2d 419, 594 Pa. 524, 2007 Pa. LEXIS 2504 (Pa. 2007).

Pincite

937 A.2d 419 (Commonwealth v. Segida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related