Commonwealth v. Scuilli

652 A.2d 1300, 539 Pa. 440, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 59
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 1995·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed today in Commonwealth v. Stipetich, — Pa. -, 652 A.2d 1294 (1993), the non-prosecution agreement between the appellee, Bernard J. Scuilli, and a municipal police officer is not binding upon the District Attorney of Alegheny County. Accordingly, the order of the Superior Court affirming the trial court’s dismissal of charges against appellee is reversed, 423 Pa.Super. 453, 621 A.2d 620, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

PAPADAKOS, J., concurs in the result.

CAPPY, J., files a dissenting opinion which is joined by ZAPPALA, J.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Scuilli, 652 A.2d 1300, 539 Pa. 440, 1995 Pa. LEXIS 59 (Pa. 1995).

652 A.2d 1300 (Commonwealth v. Scuilli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Scuilli
621 A.2d 620 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Commonwealth v. Stipetich
652 A.2d 1294 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)