Commonwealth v. Scott, T., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Scott, T., Pet (Commonwealth v. Scott, T., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 86 WM 2016 : Respondent : : : v. : : : THOMAS MARCEL SCOTT, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is
not permitted).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Scott, T., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-scott-t-pet-pa-2016.