Commonwealth v. Scott
344 A.2d 504, 236 Pa. Super. 517, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1722
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Scott. Read the opinion of the Court — 246 Pa. Super. 58 →
Opinion
Opinion
Appellant’s sole claim is that his waiver of a jury trial was inadequate under the standards set forth in Commonwealth v. Williams, 454 Pa. 368, 312 A.2d 597 (1973). This issue not having been raised in post-trial motions, it cannot be raised on this direct appeal. Commonwealth v. Agie, 449 Pa. 187, 296 A.2d 741 (1972).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Scott, 344 A.2d 504, 236 Pa. Super. 517, 1975 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1722 (Pa. Ct. App. 1975).
344 A.2d 504 (Commonwealth v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Williams
312 A.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Agie
296 A.2d 741 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)